Remember, this is just an experiment from an amaetur that may or may not be repeatable.so here goes nothing. It automatically calculates in real time the following.
My hope is this will give me a good sense if my result from my poor man timegrapher is at least close enough OR totally the opposite (which proof that the poor man timegrapher is not working) to the results that I already known. This is a mechanical watch precision tool commonly used in watch regulation and beat error correction. I will be using my three watches (Certina, Hamilton and Fortis), which I've been manually timed and tracked after regulation. I use the sponge to provide additional cover to the watch to help reduce the unwanted noise. I chose the Fortis box because it has a drawer style type box and thick with loads of padding inside.
So, I started looking for items around the house to do the experiment.īeside downloading the software, the following items were usedt: It can be done, but a timegrapher makes regulation so. The challenges I have gathered from reading is to get a good microphone to be able to hear the beat from the watch and a good insulation to reduce/remove unwanted noise. You will have a difficult time regulating a watch without a timegrapher. Stumble upon a suggestion from svorkoetter on watch-o-scope free software for Windows. The timegrapher suggestion from mleok and SomeAssemblyRequired got me into the research mode again.
I've recently went on an adventure to regulate my own ETA watches.
0 kommentar(er)
